Reliance and BP begin commissioning work on Indian flagship deep-water gas field

Indian private-sector giant Reliance Industries and UK supermajor BP have begun commissioning activities at a flagship deep-water asset in the Krishna Godavari basin offshore India’s east coast. Reliance has started testing the floating production, storage and offloading vessel and other subsea structures at the MJ gas in field in the KG-D6 block, with “commissioning activities” under way, according to its latest quarterly results. “As an essential part of the testing, one well has been opened to flow gas through the integrated production system,” it said Reliance noted that the incremental gas production from the MJ field, along with ongoing production from R Cluster and Satellite Cluster Reliance said that the “lower and upper completion campaign” for the MJ wells is progressing as planned Four wells have been completed, with “balance wells” expected to be completed by the third quarter of the 2023-2024 financial year, it added. The ceiling price applicable for gas produced from KG-D6 has been revised to $12.12 per million British thermal units for the first half of the financial year, it stated. Ruby on location The operator earlier said that the Ruby FPSO had arrived at the MJ field last year. Reliance and BP had previously hoped to commission the MJ field by the end of last year, but were delayed by a few months due to an accident involving the FPSO, and bad weather. Upstream reported in October that the Ruby FPSO was involved in a collision with an accommodation barge, causing minor damage to the floater.
India’s RIL ups O2C revenue in FY2022-23 on crude rally

Indian private-sector refiner Reliance Industries (RIL) posted higher revenue from its oil-to-chemicals (O2C) business during the April 2022-March 2023 fiscal year because of a rise in average crude prices and higher price realisation from transportation fuels. RIL’s revenue from the O2C business rose to 5.95 trillion rupees ($72.6bn) in 2022-23, up by nearly 19pc from Rs5.1 trillion a year earlier, the company said in a stock exchange filing. Revenue increased led by the rise in export profits because of higher prices for transportation fuels, despite lower production. RIL said its access to global markets and sourcing of cheaper crude and feedstock from outside India helped improve its O2C margins during 2022-23. But the government’s excise duty on fuel exports, imposed in July last year, trimmed profits by Rs 66.48 billion during 2022-23, the company said. India scrapped its export tax on diesel and reimposed a windfall tax on crude production, in the latest adjustment to its tax scheme on 19 April. Delhi reimposed a windfall tax on crude of about 6,400 rupees/t ($10.63/bl) after previously slashing it to zero. The government also scrapped a Rs0.50/litre export tax on diesel, according to a finance ministry notification. This is the first time that the diesel export duties have been scrapped since the tax scheme was introduced in July 2022, following the continued weakening of Asian gasoil margins. The rise in O2C revenue for 2022-23 came despite a decline during the January-March 2023 quarter. RIL’s O2C revenue during January-March fell by nearly 12pc from a year earlier to Rs1.28 trillion because of sharp falls in crude prices and a decline in realised prices for downstream products, the company said. The export duty on fuel reduced earnings by Rs7.11bn during the quarter, RIL said. RIL’s refinery throughput rose marginally to 77mn t/yr (1.55mn b/d) over 2022-23 from 1.54mn b/d in 2021-22. But throughput rose to 1.61mn b/d during January-March, up by 5.3pc from 1.53mn b/d a year earlier. RIL’s overall profit rose to Rs741bn in 2022-23, up from Rs650bn a year earlier. Profit also rose to Rs213bn during January-March, up by 20pc from Rs178bn in October-December and by 18pc from Rs180bn a year earlier. The company’s gross revenue rose by 23pc on the year to Rs9.77 trillion in 2022-23, driven by revenues from its oil and gas business more than doubling to Rs165bn, as well as gains in other business such as O2C and digital services. The company said its oil and gas segment is poised to make up 30pc of India’s domestic gas production. RIL is set to commission the MJ deepwater gas fields in the Krishna-Godavari (KG)-D6 basin during the April-June 2024 quarter, with production from the field aimed at 12mn m³/d during the April 2023-March 2024 fiscal year. With the commissioning of the MJ fields, gas output from RIL-BP’s KG-D6 block will rise to 30mn m³/d during 2023-24, accounting for 30pc of India’s overall gas production and 15pc of the country’s gas demand.
China’s Economy Is Picking Up, But Oil Demand May Disappoint

China’s economy grew by 2.2 percent on a seasonally adjusted basis in the first quarter (Q1), a massive improvement on the previous quarter’s 0.6 percent growth. Also positive from the economic perspective was that this was the third straight quarterly expansion after China began to ease COVID-19 restrictions in the second half of last year. This said, unlike much of China’s stellar economic growth from the mid-1990s to before the COVID-19 pandemic hit in 2020, this growth may not translate so directly into equally startling rises in the price of oil. The previously very direct correlation between China’s economic growth and oil prices was evidenced in the fact that almost on its own it drove the super-cycle of ever-rising prices for commodities key to its economic growth over that period. One such commodity was oil, which was vital to powering the country’s largely manufacturing-led economic boom during those years. Because of the massive disparity between the sheer scale of China’s energy needs and the paucity of its own oil and gas resources, the country quickly became the big bid in the global oil market. By 2013, it had become the world’s largest net importer of total petroleum and other liquid fuels, and by 2017 it had overtaken the U.S. as the largest annual gross crude oil importer in the world as well. It is unsurprising, then, that many in the current oil market have been waiting for signs of a big recovery in China’s economic growth, believing that it will automatically herald a big bounce in oil prices. The first part of this equation may well be taking place, as not only were Q1’s figures good but they may well become better. “The Q1 [GDP] number surprised to the upside, and the momentum of domestic demand puts upside risks to our 5.5 per cent GDP forecast for 2023,” Eugenia Victorino, head of Asia strategy for SEB in Singapore exclusively told OilPrice.com last week. “Looking ahead, low base effects – including the Shanghai lockdown, which lasted more than 60 days in Q2 2022 – will push up the annual prints in Q2 this year, so, assuming domestic demand remains on a path to recovery in the coming months, Q2 GDP will likely rise to around 8 per cent year on year,” she added. Further signs that China’s economic growth rebound may surprise on the upside have come from its long-beleaguered property sector. Although property price inflation remains in negative territory, prices continue to post monthly improvements, with 64 out of 70 cities now reporting monthly price gains. Home sales have also surprised on the upside, coming from various Tier-1 and Tier-2 cities, with existing homes and China’s state-owned enterprise developers topping the transaction charts, Rory Green, chief China economist for TS Lombard, in London, exclusively told OilPrice.com. There is still caution evident in the market, he said, with the composition of sales indicating that consumers remain concerned about the viability of pre-sales, which make up 70-80 per cent of total transactions. However, highlighted Green, although the speed and magnitude of the rebound in China’s property market remain in question, a bottom appears to have formed in it. This said, the second part of the equation – that a strong Chinese economic rebound will automatically herald a big bounce in oil prices – is far less certain. The first part of China’s massive economic growth was founded on a huge energy-intensive expansion of its manufacturing capabilities. This also involved the mass migration of new workers from the countryside and into the cities, which required a huge energy-intensive infrastructure build-out. This change marked the second phase of China’s economic growth mix. This continued for years, alongside the third phase of China’s economic growth, which was the rise of a middle class that powered domestic consumption-led demand for goods and services. All these phases to date had the net result of increasing China’s demand for energy exponentially, to the point where it is now – for oil alone – around 15 million barrels per day (bpd). This is around 19 per cent of world demand for crude oil. The problem for unreconstructed oil bulls is that the nature of this current phase of economic growth in China is not like any that the markets have seen before. “China’s central leadership is relying on reopening and the removal of negative policies – property, consumer internet, and geopolitics – rather than aggressive stimulus, to drive activity,” TS Lombard’s Green told OilPrice.com. “For the first time, a cyclical recovery in China will be led by household consumption, mainly services, as there is a great deal of pent-up demand and savings – about 4 per cent of GDP – following three years of intermittent mobility restrictions,” he added. For oil prices, he underlined, it is apposite to note that transportation accounts for just 54 per cent of China’s oil consumption, compared to 72 per cent in the US and 68 per cent in the European Union. In 2022, net oil and refined petroleum imports were 8 per cent lower by volume than the pre-pandemic peak, with infrastructure and export-oriented manufacturing partly offsetting lower mobility and less property construction. “Demand drivers should switch this year, with travel rising and property less negative, while infrastructure and manufacturing slow,” said Green. “The certain outcome is an increase in oil demand – we estimate a 5-8 per cent increase in net import volumes – but this is unlikely to cause oil prices to surge, especially as China is buying at a discount from Russia,” he concluded.
U.S. Stresses Importance Of LNG For Europe

Russian President Vladimir Putin belied that his invasion of Ukraine in 2022 would go largely unopposed by the U.S. and its allies for the same reason that he was able to invade the country in 2014 and annex Crimea. That is, that the non-U.S. part of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) – Europe – would not to risk being cut off from the cheap and plentiful supplies of Russian gas that they had been using for decades to power their economies. He was wrong this time, for a variety of reasons analysed in my new book on the new global oil market order. Not only were the NATO allies not prepared to roll over this time in favour solely of their own interests but Putin’s actions in Ukraine have re-energised the U.S.-led security, economic, and energy alliance comprising most European countries and many Asian ones as well. To safeguard these gains, the U.S. last week stressed the necessity for the allies to ramp up investments in gas to ensure that never again would the alliance be hostage to the weaponised energy supplies of Russia. Speaking at a G7 ministers’ meeting on climate, energy and environment in Japan, U.S. Assistant Energy Secretary, Andrew Light, highlighted the need for continued investments by the allies in new gas supplies. He also stressed that U.S. liquefied natural gas (LNG) supplies remain critical to European energy security as it continues to reduce its reliance on Russian gas. He added that the U.S. is not concerned about Russia still being able to sell its oil and gas, despite sanctions, as it is allowing countries to buy energy at lower prices. This feeds into the idea that the price cap on Russian energy sales is also part of the U.S.’s broader policy of keeping oil and gas prices down, and with the ‘Trump Oil Price Range’, as also analysed in my new book on the new global oil market order. This is not only for the U.S.-centric economic and political reasons examined in the book, but also because rising energy prices drive inflation higher, in turn pushing fuelling the interest rates used to combat it, and increasing the prospect of recession in many of the U.S.’s allies. Interestingly as well, and in keeping with the geopolitical realignment evident since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Light also underlined that the U.S. and its allies are also looking to diversify the supply chains of materials that have long been dominated by China. “We don’t want to be at the mercy of China and put them in the same position vis a vis the rest of the world as Russia has been with Europe,” Light concluded. Prior to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, the only real flurry of activity in terms of a concerted effort by any group within the European Union (EU) was aimed at ensuring that Russia did not stop supplying its member states with either oil or gas, due to their not being able to pay in the way Moscow preferred. This followed the 31 March 2022 decree signed by President Vladimir Putin that required EU buyers to pay in roubles for Russian gas via a new currency conversion mechanism or risk having supplies suspended. According to an official guidance document sent out to all 27 EU member states on 21 April by its executive branch, the European Commission (EC): “It appears possible [to pay for Russian gas after the adoption of the new decree without being in conflict with EU law],… EU companies can ask their Russian counterparts to fulfil their contractual obligations in the same manner as before the adoption of the decree, i.e. by depositing the due amount in euros or dollars.’” The EC added that existing EU sanctions against Russia also did not prohibit engagement with Russia’s Gazprom or Gazprombank beyond the refinancing prohibitions relating to the bank. Several EU member states made it plain that they would veto any EU proposal to ban Russian gas (or oil) imports – and all 27 EU member states must vote in favour of such a ban for it to come into effect. However, under considerable ‘encouragement’ from the U.S., Germany – the de facto leader of the EU – performed a 180-degree turnaround in its previously fiercely pro-Russian energy stance, bolstered in the first instance by a U.S.-led deal for LNG supplies from Qatar. LNG remains the most flexible form of gas for buyers, being readily available in the spot markets and able to be moved very quickly to anywhere required, unlike gas sent through pipelines. Unlike pipelined gas as well, the movement of LNG does not require the time- and money-intensive build-out of vast acreage of pipelines across varied terrains and the associated heavy infrastructure that supports it. In essence, LNG supplies are the ‘swing gas supply’ in any global gas supply emergency, as was the case back then in the first half of 2022. May of that year, then, saw Qatar sign a declaration of intent on energy cooperation with Germany aimed at becoming its key supplier of LNG. These new supplies of LNG from Qatar would come into Germany through existing importation routes augmented by new infrastructure approved by the German Bundestag on 19 May. This would include the deployment of four floating LNG import facilities on its northern coast, and two permanent onshore terminals, which were under development. These plans would run in parallel with, but were likely to be finished significantly sooner than, the plans for Qatar to also make available to Germany sizeable supplies of LNG from the Golden Pass terminal on the Gulf Coast of Texas. QatarEnergy holds a 70 per cent stake in the project, with the U.S.’s ExxonMobil holding the remainder. The Golden Pass terminal’s estimated send-out capacity is projected to be around 18 million metric tonnes per annum (mtpa) of LNG and the facility is expected to be operational in 2024. Also heavily linked in with the U.S. was a very similar announcement in December
OPEC’s share of Indian oil imports down to 22-year low. Here’s why

OPEC’s share of India’s oil imports fell at the fastest pace in 2022/23 to the lowest in at least 22 years, as intake of cheaper Russian oil surged, data obtained from industry sources show, and the major producers’ share could shrink further this year. Members of the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), mainly from the Middle East and Africa, saw their share of India’s oil market slide to 59% in the fiscal year to March 2023, from about 72% in 2021/22, a Reuters analysis of the data that dates back to 2001/02 showed. Russia overtook Iraq for the first time to emerge as the top oil supplier to India, pushing Saudi Arabia down to No. 3 in the last fiscal year, the data showed. OPEC’s share shrank as India, which in the past rarely bought Russian oil due to high freight costs, is now the top oil client for Russian seaborne oil, rejected by Western nations following Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. India shipped in about 1.6 million barrels per day (bpd) of Russian oil in 2022/23, the data showed, about 23% of its overall 4.65 million bpd imports. The decision by OPEC and their allies, a group known as OPEC+ to cut production in May could further squeeze OPEC’s share in India, the world’s third largest oil importer, later this year if Russian supplies stay elevated.
Built And Financed By India, Mongolia’s First Greenfield Oil Refinery To Be Ready By 2025

Mongolia’s first oil refinery, being built on the outskirts of the capital city, Ulaanbaatar, and funded with Indian assistance, will be completed by 2025, said the country’s Ambassador Dambajav Ganbold. In an interview with a Livemint, Ganbold said the first stage of Mongol Oil Refinery, built with a $1.2 billion Indian soft loan, will be completed at the end of this year. The development assumes significance as Mongolia is entirely dependent on Russia for its energy imports and the new refinery at Altanshiree Soum in the country’s Dornogobi province would help Mongolia meet 70 per cent of its demand domestically. It’s being seen as a major step amid the crisis because of the Russia-Ukraine war and the cost of oil shooting up manyfold. It was in 2015 during the visit of Prime Minister Narendra Modi to Mongolia that an agreement between the governments was made to establish the first oil refinery in Mongolia. The Mongol Refinery is being developed under a government-to-government (G2G) partnership between Mongolia and India. It forms part of the Development Partnership Administration initiative of India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA). The project, which is the first greenfield oil refinery in Mongolia, includes a pipeline and a power plant as part of its operations. Upon completion, the refinery will have the capacity to process 30,000 barrels of crude oil per day or 1.5 million tonnes per annum. The refinery project consists of four packages. The first package, or EPC 1, is more than 70 per cent complete right now and will be completed within this year. It was in 2019 when the construction had started on the first phase of the project. The remaining three packages have gone through the tender process and Hyderabad-based Megha Engineering and Infrastructures Limited (MEIL) has been selected. The company would provide would provide EPC (engineering, procurement and construction) services and EPC-3 (captive power plants) at a cost of $790 million using advanced technology. Under the EPC deal, MEIL will build open art, utilities and offsites, along with plant buildings, and captive power plants for the refinery.
Explained: Why are global crude oil prices falling

Global crude oil prices have been falling gradually over the past few months and the trend seems no signs of reversing anytime soon. Oil prices continued their downward trend on Monday due to a range of global factors that have clouded its demand outlook. Rising interest rates and the ongoing global economic slowdown have also impacted crude oil prices, despite the prospect of tighter supplies on OPEC+ supply cuts. Brent crude and US West Texas Intermediate crude were down on Monday, marking their first weekly drop in over a month. Oil prices have been hurt by the growing fears of a recession in the US, which is the top oil consumer in the world. Weak US economic data and weaker-than-expected corporate earnings from the tech sector have cast a shadow over future growth, leading to cautious sentiments about the commodity among investors. CMC Markets analyst Tina Teng told news agency Reuters that the stabilisation of the US dollar and climbing bond yields are pressurizing commodity markets. It may be noted that central banks around the globe are expected to raise interest rates in May in a bid to tackle high inflation. This could further impact demand for crude oil among major oil-importing nations. Moreover, China’s edgy economic recovery after the Covid-19 has also clouded oil demand outlook, even as Chinese customers’ data showed on Friday that the world’s top crude importer brought in record volumes in March. China’s imports from top suppliers Russia and Saudi Arabia were more than 2 million barrels per day each. John Driscoll, director of JTD Energy Services, told news agency Reuters that the recent correction in oil prices is due to mixed economic data and continued central bank intervention. Meanwhile, analysts and traders remained bullish about China’s fuel demand recovery towards the second half of 2023 and as additional supply cuts planned by OPEC+ from May could tighten markets. Analysts at the National Australia Bank expect China’s oil demand recovery to more than offset the slowdown in OECD demand in the near term, while sanctions and supply constraints add upside risks to prices. They said that Brent could rise to $92 per barrel by the end of the second quarter.
GAIL to get 4 LNG cargoes from Germany’s Sefe in May

Indian gas firm GAIL (India) Ltd will get 4 cargoes of liquefied natural gas (LNG) from Germany’s Sefe in May, equivalent to volumes it was getting under a deal with a former unit of Russia’s Gazprom, Chairman Sandeep Gupta said on Monday. Sefe supplied 2 LNG cargoes each in March and April. “Sefe will decide on volumes on a month to month basis,” Gupta told reporters on the sidelines of an event. The resumption of supplies from Sefe is crucial for GAIL, which reported an almost 93% slump in its December quarter profit due to lower gas sales triggered by supply disruptions. GAIL agreed to a 20-year LNG purchase deal with Russian energy giant Gazprom in 2012. The deal was signed with Gazprom Marketing and Singapore (GMTS) for annual purchases of an average of 2.5 million tonnes of LNG. At the time, GMTS was a unit of Gazprom Germania, now called Sefe, but the Russian parent gave up ownership of Sefe after Western sanctions were imposed on Moscow over its invasion of Ukraine last year.
Indian companies sometimes face delays in paying for Russian oil above $60/bbl: Oil secretary

Indian companies “sometimes” face delays in paying for Russian oil priced above the $60 cap per barrel fixed by the Western nations, India’s oil secretary Pankaj Jain said on Monday. “Nobody stops us from buying Russian oil at above the price cap level provided. We are not using western service,” Jain told reporters on the sidelines of an event. In case of Russian oil priced above the cap, the companies on their own manage to find alternative mechanisms to settle payments, he said, adding most Russian oil supplies to India are made at below the price cap level. He also said India is seeking to buy oil at discounts from other countries depending on grades. India has significantly increased oil imports from Russia since the beginning of the conflict in Ukraine.
Oil & Gas In The Age Of Climate Change

Rising sea levels, wild-fires, heat waves and extreme weather events are already wreaking havoc everywhere and could cost the global economy hundreds of billions of dollars in crumbling infrastructure, reduced crop yields, health problems, and lost labor. When most people think about climate change, the oil and gas industries tend to take the lion’s share of the blame due to their high levels of CO2 and GHG emissions. Few people, however, pause and consider that the same ecological fallout that is hurting communities is also taking a toll on the fossil fuel industry. Climate change is making it costlier for oil and gas companies to operate. Indeed, climate-related?supply threats have already begun to manifest in the oil and gas industry, with more than 600 billion barrels equivalent of the world’s commercially recoverable oil and gas reserves, or 40% of total reserves, facing high or extreme risks. According to UK-based global risk and strategic consulting firm Verisk Maplecroft, the risk of?climate related events disrupting?the flow?of oil?to global markets?is highest in Saudi Arabia, Iraq and Nigeria. This revelation is worrying considering growing signals of peak oil supply. A growing number of U.S. industry executives expect US. oil production to peak within the next five or six years while others think the peak will come much earlier, Expectations for another shale boom are quickly dying thanks to rising costs as well as limited supplies of labor and equipment hamstringing efforts by U.S. shale producers to quickly ramp up production. Thankfully, the oil and gas industry is committing itself more to efforts aimed at slowing down climate change. The Carbon Capture Opportunity While trees and other plants naturally remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, most climate change experts now agree that we are just not capable of planting enough, fast enough, to limit the damage. Carbon capture is one technology that has been proposed to limit global warming and climate change. Both the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and International Energy Agency (IEA) consider carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) an ideal solution for many hard-to-abate sectors such as aviation, hydrogen production and cement from fossil fuels. Unfortunately, the world has fallen woefully short when it comes to investing in CCUS: according to the International Energy Agency (IEA) there are only 35 commercial facilities globally that are applying CCUS to industrial processes, fuel transformation and power generation, with a total annual capture capacity of ~45?Mt?CO2. However, McKinsey estimates that global CCUS uptake needs to be 120x higher, rising to at least 4.2 gigatons per annum (GTPA) of CO2 captured, for the world to achieve its net-zero commitments by 2050. Still, Big Oil is beginning to step up in a big way, even if it is, in the end, more of a way of extending life than contributing to a lessening of the effects of climate change. Over the past few years, Big Oil firms have started investing heavily in CCUS, which many argue is simply Big Oil’s way of extending the life of oil and gas fields because captured carbon is used for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Two weeks ago, Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) CEO Darren Woods told investors that the company’s Low Carbon business has the potential to outperform its legacy oil and gas business within a decade and generate hundreds of billions in revenues. Woods outlined projections showing how the business has the potential to hit revenue of billions of dollars within the next five years; tens of billions in 5-10 years, and hundreds of billions after the initial 10-year ramp-up. However, whether Exxon is able to actualize its goal will depend on regulatory and policy support for carbon pricing, as well as the cost to abate greenhouse gas emissions, among other changes, Ammann said. Exxon believes that this will result in a “much more stable, or less cyclical” that is less prone to commodity price swings through predictable, long-term contracts with customers aiming to lower their own carbon footprint. For instance, Exxon recently signed a long-term contract with industrial gas company Linde Plc. (NYSE:LIN) that involves offtake of carbon dioxide associated with Linde’s planned clean hydrogen project in Beaumont, Texas. Exxon will transport and permanently store as much as 2.2M metric tons/year of carbon dioxide each year from Linde’s plant. Back in February, Linde unveiled plans to build a $1.8B complex which will include autothermal reforming with carbon capture and a large air separation plant to supply clean hydrogen and nitrogen. SLB New Energy Back in February, oil field services giant Schlumberger Ltd (NYSE:SLB) discussed its newly carved SLB New Energy unit with Bloomberg New Energy Finance (BNEF). According to SLB New Energy president Gavin Rennick, the unit is expected to hit revenue of $3 billion by the end of the current decade and at least $10 billion by the end of the next decade. SLB will focus on five key niches, each with a minimum addressable market of $10 billion.: •Carbon solutions •Hydrogen •Geothermal and geoenergy •Energy storage •Critical minerals Of these segments, Rennick says carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS) is the fastest growing opportunity thanks to the significant boost it got from the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Occidental To achieve our climate goal, McKinsey has proposed the creation of CCUS hubs, essentially a cluster of facilities that share the same CO2 transportation and storage or utilization infrastructure. Currently, there are only 15 CCUS hubs across the globe; MckInsey estimates that there’s the potential to build as many as 700 CCUS hubs globally, located on, or close to, potential storage locations and Enhanced Oil and Gas Recovery (EOR/EGR) sites. The U.S. government is currently backing four hubs, with two major Occidental Petroleum Corporation’s (NYSE:OXY) projects seen as strong contenders. The government is offering three levels of funding, ranging from $3 million for early stage feasibility studies to $12.5 million for engineering design studies to up to $500 million for projects ready to complete the procurement, construction and operation phases. Swiss start-up Climeworks, which has raised more than